Opposition to California’s 2022 Proposed State Bills

• Videos of CA Senate Committee Hearings → https://www.senate.ca.gov/media-archive
• Videos of CA Assembly Committee Hearings → https://www.assembly.ca.gov/media-archive

Things are moving fast; we do not have enough support in web production and video editors . . . anyone willing to help out right now? Tell us by completing the form here and providing your email and tel → https://wirecalifornia.org/join

---

CA Assembly Appropriations Committee Hearings: Aug 19 and Aug 25, 2021

---

On Aug 13, 2021 . . . The Unnecessary Wireless Telecom Expansion . . . Hit a Roadblock: The FCC RF/MW Radiation Guideline for frequencies above 6,000 MHz Was Vacated by the US Court of Appeals, DC Circuit

Aug 16 — California Senate Appropriations Committee re: AB.537	Aug 21 — Housatonic Live Episode 71.6: FCC’s RF Microwave Radiation Guideline Vacated, in part, by The US Court of Appeals, DC Circuit

July 16 — CA Senator Mike McGuire re: 2021 CA Broadband Budget Bill, AB.156

July 19 — Petaluma City Council Meeting Public Comment

At 10:35 — Q: Can localities access be wired or wireless for so-called “last mile” (which is really the last 25-250 feet)? A: A mixture of both. At 15:00 — Q: What is the federal definition of broadband? A: 25 Mbps download, 3 Mbps upload At 21:50 — Q: Will private wireless companies will have influence on what technology will be used for the last last 25-250 feet? A: If a city or county want to contract with a co. they can do so, but the State Govt. has to own the system for at least 20 years.It will be a local choice.

The CA Senate And Assembly Perpetrate Shenanigans in “Deliberating” on SB.556, AB.537 & SB.378, With a Lack of Due Process and a Silencing of the Public

---

July 14 — CA Sen Budget & Fiscal Review Hearing re: AB.156 CA Broadband Budget	July 15 — CA Senate Appropriations Hearing: Call out to CA State Public Health Officer — Dr. Tomás Aragón

July 8 — Senate Governance and Finance Committee Deliberation on AB.537

---

July 7 — CA Assembly Communications & Conveyance Hearing re: SB.556 and SB.378	July 8 — Public Testimony Opposing AB.537 at CA Senate Governance and Finance Committee

---

June 21 — Opposition to SB.556, AB.537 and SB.378 at CA Senate Energy, Utilities and Communications Hearing	June 24 — Next Steps in Opposing SB.556, SB.378 & SB.378 Read about the Cell Tower that Fell onto the Stands at the Chula Vista High School Football Field

---

May 27 — First CA Senate Vote on SB.556	June 9 — Opposition to SB.556 & SB.378 at CA Assembly Local Government Committee Hearing; see in the image below how CA Senators and Assembly members sell the public’s public safety, privacy and property values for large checks to further their own careers. Representative government?

---

May 17 — Strong Opposition at CA Senate Appropriations Committee Hearing	May 19 — Opposition at CA Assembly Appropriations Committee Hearing

---

CA Assembly Communications & Conveyance Hearing on Wireless Bills: AB.537 et. al — Apr 28, 2021

Apr 28 — CA Assembly Communications & Conveyance Hearing on Wireless Bills: AB.537 et. al	May 5 — Housatonic Live Master Class re: Local Control over Wireless Telecommunications Facilities (Link to full video)

Key Challenges and Testimony Here

1. Attempting to Speak in Opposition to AB.1485 → https://youtu.be/Gyz52mOVKIo?t=13m58s (view for two minutes)
2. Point of Order raised in AB.537 deliberation → https://youtu.be/Gyz52mOVKIo?t=34m58s (view for 30 seconds).
3. Telephone testimony in Opposition AB.537 starts → https://youtu.be/Gyz52mOVKIo?t=37m2s
4. Bob Williams telephone testimony against AB.537 → https://youtu.be/Gyz52mOVKIo?t=46m19s ( Bob was was cut off before talking about the definition of a Small Wireless Facility was wiped out in the courts; there were 61 speakers on the line, when Bob called in from the hallway outside the gallery)
5. Moderator likely lies → https://youtu.be/Gyz52mOVKIo?t=47m34s when he says “there are no further lines in queue.” What happened to the rest of the 61?
6. Primary Opposition Speaker slot against AB.1176 → https://youtu.be/Gyz52mOVKIo?t=50m50s (name was read off of the Santiago’s cell phone)
7. Comment in Opposition to AB.1176 → https://youtu.be/Gyz52mOVKIo?t=57m3s (view until 59:25)
8. Primary Opposition Speaker slot against the Consent items AB.995 and AB.1483 → https://youtu.be/Gyz52mOVKIo?t=1h1m15s (view until 1:03:35)

---

In CA, the alleged State Government of the people, by the people and for the people has now turned against the people. The evidence below, from April 19, 2021 proves it.

Opposition to CA’s 2021 Triple Threat 6-7-8: SB.556, AB.537 and SB.378

Apr 19 — Senate Energy, Utilities & Communications Committee — Opposition to SB.556	Apr 26 — Senate Energy, Utilities & Communications Committee — Opposition to SB.378

---

Apr 22 — CA Senate Governance & Finance Committee — Opposition to SB.556	Apr 22 — Opposition to SB.556 — Epilogue

---

Apr 15 — Preserve Local Control over 4G/5G Wireless Infrastructure: Oppose CA SB.556, AB.537 & SB.378	Apr 16 — CA Senate Energy, Utilities & Communications Committee Staff Meeting

---

Apr 8 — CA Senate Governance & Finance Committee — Opposition to SB.378	Apr 14 — CA Assembly Local Government Committee — Opposition AB.537

---

Most of the following letters oppose all three bills: SB.556, AB.537 & SB.378. The common ask in these letters is to Preserve Local Control over Broadband and Telecommunications infrastructure, particularly in the public rights-of-way. The State could not possibly fully understand the current, unique infrastructure assets and opportunities of each locality. Each locality must be able to chart their own best course for Wired Broadband and Wireless Telecommunications infrastructure decisions within their respective jurisdictions.